==inizio objective==
Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) spread in the last decade as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical prostatectomy for men with localized prostate cancer. It is associated with excellent surgical, functional and oncological results with less postoperative pain and shorter convalescence. Anyway, the development of an incisional hernia (IH), may negate known benefits as it can lead not only to bothersome symptoms but also to severe complications, such as bowel obstruction, strangulation and perforation. Port-site or extraction site hernias, whose incidence rate is underdiagnosed, have become more commonly after minimally invasive surgery; but IH rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has not been well characterized.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of extraction-site location (vertical supra-umbilical incision versus an off-midline incision) on incisional hernia rates in robotic prostatectomy.
==fine objective==
==inizio methodsresults==
We included in the study 800 patients undergone RALP, 400 with a supra-umbilical incision for specimen extraction and 400 with off-midline incision. All were followed up for at least 3 years. The main study end point was IH occurrence at the extraction site (midline versus off-midline).
==fine methodsresults==
==inizio results==
IH rate for the entire series was 4.75 %., in particular 5% for the midline group and 4.5 % for the off-midline group. The hernias were diagnosed at a mean of 20,2 and 18.2 months after surgery, respectively in the two groups. There was no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics; anyway larger prostate weight, wound infection and history of prior cholecystectomy were associated with higher proportion of IH.
==fine results==
==inizio discussions==
The occurrence of IH remains underreported, problematic to patients, and a concern because it is a complication often requiring surgical revision, with a reported failure rate of 45%. Another very concerning aspect of IHs is that their incidence increases with time and appears to be largest under reported in RALP series. Mudge and Hughes demonstrated that 35% of all IHs occur after 3 years in a study that followed patients prospectively over 10 years [1]. The IH rate after RALP has been poorly defined, with a range of 0-8 %. Patel et al. had a rate of 0,2% with average follow-up of 24 months [2]. In another series of more than 600 RALP by Blatt et al, the incisional/inguinal hernia rate was 1.9% at 4 months of follow up [3]. Many factors lead to the formation of port-site hernias: mechanical factors as trocar type and size, site of specimen extraction and wound extension or stretching for organ retrial, and perioperative factors as trocars direction, wound infection, operative time, use of drain and port location, post-operatory persistent cough [4, 5]. Pre-existing disease like diabetes mellitus, connective diseases, obesity, malnutrition, smoking, umbilical defects are considered as risk factors.
Obviously an improper closure of fascial defect is the single most important factor related to HI, which more often occurs in obese patients because of it is difficult to find the fascia and the intra-abdominal pressure is higher as well [6].
Recently , it has been reported that a transverse incision at the midline trocar site decreased the incidence of IH from 5,3% to 0,6%; as the increased risk of herniation through the midline incision may be because of the lack of muscular abdominal wall layers. Specimen extraction site has been shown to play an important role in IH development and may account for the major differences in the reported hernia rates [7]. Singh et al found a significant differences when the midline was used as the extraction site compared to off midline, 17,6% vs 0% respectively in patients undergone laparoscopic colorectal surgery [8].Some authors have reported a lower incidence of hernias with the use of a para-median incision and no bladed trocars which have a conical tip [9].
The linea alba, including the umbilicus, lacks the muscle support in spontaneously fascial closure due to the lack of rectus muscle; it is possible that midline incisions through the avascular linea alba are put on tension by abdominal wall contraction directed away from the incision. This might result in tension-induced ischemia on the closure line and thus impairs wound healing, whereas paramedian incisions have been shown in animal studies to be supported by muscle re-opposition after blunt trocars were used [10].
In conclusion, the incidence of IH after RALP is likely under reported in prior studies.
==fine discussions==
==inizio conclusion==
Extraction site hernias are a rare but a potentially serious complication following RALP.
In our series, the midline extraction doesn’t result in a significantly higher IH rate in comparison with the off-midline extraction site.
==fine conclusion==
==inizio reference==
1. Mudge M, Hughes L.E.
Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitude
Bratislava Journal of Surgery, 72,no 1,70-71, 1985
2.Patel V.R, Siraman A.
Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable
Oncology, vol 26,pp616-619, 2012
3. Blatt AM,Fadahunsi A, Ahn C et al.
Surgical complications related to robotic prostatectomy; prospective analysis
J Urol 2009; 181:353
4. Fuller A, Fernandez A, Pautler S.
Incisional Hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy-predisposing factors in a prospective cohort of 250 cases.
Journal of endourology ,Vol 25, 6, 1021-1024
5. Ho J,Pigazzi A.
Laparoscopic repair of extraction site ventral hernia after robotic prostatectomy: institutional experience with 42 consecutive cases
Hernia (2011) 15: 673-676
6. Shaft A,Ahmaieh K,Shah A,Garvey E.M, Harold K.L.
Incidence and outcomes of ventral hernia repair after robotic retropubic prostatectomy: a
retrospective cohort of 570 consecutive cases.
International Journal of surgery (2017) 38: 74-77
7. Navaratnam AV, Ariyaratnam R, Smart NJ, Parker M, Motson RW, Arulampala TH
Incisional hernia rate after laparoscopic colorectal resection is reduced with standardisation of specimen extraction
Ann R Coll Surgery Engl 2015; 2015, 97: 17-21
8. Singh R, Omicicioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C.
Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates?
Surg Endosc (2008) 22:2596-2600
9. Belice C, Stocchi L, Costedio M, Gorgun E, Kessler H.
Impact of the specific extraction site location on the risk of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal resection
Dis Colon Rectus 206; 743-750
10. Beck S, Skarecky D,Osann K, Juarez R, Ahlering T
Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on
incisional hernias and cosmesis.
Urology 2011, september; 78 (3):586-590
==fine reference==